Expert Witness Services - Standard of Care:
6. Reserve Study
Case: Stonehedge Community Association vs. Leisure Capitol '85, et al.
- Retained by defendant through David Miller of Nevin & Hall, an Oakland law firm.
- Superior Court, Sacramento.
- My scope of work is to opine upon the adequacy of the defendant's Reserve Analysis and the standard of care of a condominium Board of Directors.
- The case settled prior to trial.
Case: Sears vs. Orindawoods Association
- Retained by defendant, through Ellen H. Nolting of McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure and Ney, a Walnut Creek law firm.
- My scope of work is to prepare an opinion regarding the appropriateness of the Association's Reserve Study.
- The case has settled.
Case: Campana v. The Gardens HOA, County of San Mateo.
- Retained by defendant through Mark Himelstein of counsel with Jon York & Associates, a Berkeley law firm.
- My scope of work was to prepare an opinion regarding the Association’s reserve funding program and its maintenance programs.
- The case settled prior to trial.
Case: Marbro vs. Sacramento Sutter
- Retained by defendant, through Roy Girard of Wagner, Kirkman & Blaine, a Sacramento law firm.
My scope of work is to opine upon the adequacy of the defendant's Reserve Analysis and the standard of care of a condominium Board of Directors.
- The case settled prior to trial.
Case: Martinez-Mont vs. Pacific Point HOA, County of San Mateo.
- Retained by plaintiff through Joseph M. Breall of Breall & Breall, a San Francisco law firm.
- My scope of work was to prepare an opinion regarding the Association’s reserve funding program and its maintenance programs.
- The case settled prior to trial.
